Category: Health

  • Newswire : Private data tells the story Washington won’t: Jobs are disappearing

    By: Jason Roberts and Stacy M. Brown, NNPA

     

    With the federal government shutdown grinding on, the nation’s economic picture is collapsing into silence and uncertainty. For the first time in decades, there is no official monthly employment report from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics — the same agency many now say can no longer be trusted after the White House moved to control its data release following a weak jobs report earlier this year. In the vacuum, private firms have stepped forward with independent analyses that show the country losing jobs and faith at the same time.
    ADP’s National Employment Report  found that private-sector employers shed 32,000 jobs in September, reversing the modest gains of the summer. Annual pay for job-stayers rose 4.5 percent, showing that wages are inching up even as hiring slows. “Despite the strong economic growth we saw in the second quarter, this month’s release further validates what we’ve been seeing in the labor market — that U.S. employers have been cautious with hiring,” said Dr. Nela Richardson, ADP’s chief economist. The ADP data showed the heaviest losses in manufacturing, construction, and professional services, with small and medium-sized companies suffering the steepest cuts. The Midwest lost 63,000 jobs, and gains in the West could not offset the slide.

    Bank of America’s Institute Employment Report reinforced that picture, finding “a continued cooling of the labor market.” Its data showed a 10 percent year-over-year rise in unemployment payments made to customer accounts, nearly double the most recent increase reported by the government before the shutdown. Lower-income workers continue to trail others, with after-tax wage growth of just 1.4 percent compared with 4.0 percent for higher-income households.

    Goldman Sachs produced its own estimate after the Labor Department was forced to halt publication. The investment bank calculated that initial claims for unemployment benefits rose to 224,000 in the week ending September 27, up from 218,000 a week earlier. The number of people receiving benefits slipped slightly to 1.91 million, using state-level data and seasonal adjustments that were pre-released before the shutdown.

    Reuters reported that the Chicago Federal Reserve used private “real-time” indicators to estimate the national unemployment rate at 4.3 percent, though without federal verification, that figure is uncertain.

    Global investment firm Carlyle also stepped in, releasing its own economic indicators drawn from its portfolio of 277 companies and nearly 730,000 employees. Carlyle estimated that U.S. employers added only 17,000 jobs in September and that real private residential construction spending declined 2.5 percent, even as business investment rose 4.8 percent, driven by technology and artificial intelligence projects. “Corporate spending, particularly in technology and AI infrastructure, continues to power growth while household consumption ends the quarter on a high note,” said Jason Thomas, Carlyle’s Head of Global Research and Investment Strategy.

    Yet while private analysts fill the gap left by a silenced federal government, the shutdown’s impact on workers and families has become its most defining consequence.

    A newly revealed memo from the Office of Management and Budget claims that federal workers forced into furlough during the ongoing shutdown may not receive back pay once the ordeal ends. In open defiance of the law, the administration argues that the 2019 Government Employee Fair Treatment Act does not automatically guarantee wages to workers sent home or ordered to labor without compensation.
    The government that once promised fairness has now declared that those who serve it may be discarded. This is not confusion. It is control. Mark Paoletta, the administration’s top lawyer at the budget office, wrote that Congress must pass new legislation to authorize those payments. His reasoning is what one former Republican official called “clearly against its intent.” In other words, the government rewrote the law to justify punishing the very people who keep it running.
    President Trump offered no compassion, only contempt. “It depends on who we’re talking about,” he said when asked if furloughed workers would receive back pay. “There are some people who really don’t deserve to be taken care of, and we’ll take care of them in a different way.” Those words echo not from a leader, but from a ruler measuring human worth as though it were a currency. Across the country, millions now live the consequences of those words. Families of federal workers stare at empty refrigerators — the most recent estimate revealed that more than 49,000 District residents, or 13 percent, are federally employed — and rent notices pile up. CNN reported that many workers will receive smaller paychecks this week, the last they may see until the shutdown ends. What kind of democracy weaponizes hunger against its own citizens?
    The administration’s defiance also contradicts its own Office of Personnel Management, which stated that “employees who were furloughed as a result of the lapse will receive retroactive pay for those furlough periods” once the shutdown ends. But this White House does not deal in law; it deals in loyalty. It rewards obedience and punishes dissent. It governs by threat and humiliation. And as the government remains closed and official data suppressed, America’s workers — both public and private — are left to piece together their own picture of a country in economic and moral decline.

  • Newswire : A Supreme Court fight over Voting Rights

    Attorney Janai Nelson, President NAACP-LDF

    By April Ryan, NNPA White House Correspondent

     

    Janai Nelson, President of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and Head of Counsel for the organization, argued before the U.S. Supreme Court last Wednesday for the civil rights stance of leaving Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act untouched. Spencer Overton, a professor at George Washington University, was in the High Court when the arguments took place over Louisiana v Callais.

    Overton proudly emphasized that “Jaina [Nelson] was basically like Bruce Lee taking on everybody.” Overton, an expert on redistricting, said, “Six of the nine justices were coming for Jaina. “She was taking on many arguments, “she’s got three different parties, the state of Louisiana (https://www.instagram.com/reel/DP1b5c7iDq_/?igsh=aTV1aWtrbnl5c2Mz), the Trump administration, and the so-called non-Black plaintiffs, the Callais plaintiffs.”

    The core of the argument is that race is a factor in the second Black district in Louisiana out of its six districts. White residents have claimed it is unconstitutional and reverse racism to have that second district. Opponents of Voting Rights questioned whether creating the second Black Louisiana district violates the 14th or 15th Amendment. They also wondered whether the affirmative action ban justifies striking down Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. “They’re all arguing against her [Janai Nelson], so she’s there, and you know she did a great job. I can’t see anyone doing a better job with what she had to work with,” added Overton.
    She argued that the nation should “stay with the current doctrine, which has been working for 40 years.” Former head of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Mary Frances Berry, gave her analysis on the court session stating, “From the justices responses to the oral arguments, looks like Chief Justices Roberts will win his crusade to get rid of efforts to use the law to provide equal justice for Blacks- meaning the conservative majority gets rid of districts created by states to govern Black voters the right to vote for the candidates of their choice.
    “Blunt in her assessment, Berry added, “It also means that Republicans can draw maps in such a way to create more congressional districts to stay in power for the foreseeable future.” The expectation is that the Supreme Court will decide on redistricting Louisiana in January or February to give states time to make changes before the 2026 elections.
    Civil Rights organizations believe that this type of decision could have a crippling effect on the 2026 midterm election process. If Republicans win, it will affect about 20 members of the Congressional Black Caucus and lawmakers representing Hispanic districts.
    Eric Holder, the Obama administration’s Attorney General, issued a written statement on the severity of this attack on the right to vote: “In the midst of the greatest attack on the right to vote since Jim Crow, our nation’s highest tribunal and other courts must protect this most vital of rights. The Court must make it clear that violating the voting rights of American citizens will not be tolerated, and it must do so by permanently reinstating Louisiana’s Voting Rights Act-compliant map.”
    In 2013, a Supreme Court case bearing Eric Holder’s name, Shelby V. Holder, was the first significant attack to begin gutting the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act.

  • No Kings Rally in Selma, Alabama, one of 15 in Alabama, one of 2,700 nationwide, attract 7 million people opposed to Trump’s authoritarianism

    The photos above are of the “No King’s Rally” in Selma, Alabama on Saturday, October 18, 2025. Over 100 protestors in Selma, at the foot of the Edmund Pettus Bridge, joined millions nationwide in opposing the authoritarian, dictatorial, un-Constitutional and immoral policies of the Trump-Vance Administration.

  • Eutaw City Council holds regular meeting on October 14, 2025, dealing with routine matters

    The Eutaw City Council held its regular meeting on October 14, which is likely to be the second to last meeting presided over by Mayor Latasha Johnson as her four-year term comes to a close at the end of the month.
    The meeting was fairly routine in approving required city business matters but not tackling new initiatives, policies or programs. The Council tabled a budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2025, since most of the expenditures will be made in the initial months of the next mayor’s administration. Even though the budget was listed as a draft budget for the 25-26 Fiscal Year, the council members did not want to encumber the plans of the new Administration with a budget that it would have to change.
    At the end of the meeting, it was announced that the inauguration of the new Mayor, Corey Cockrell, and the five council members, would be held on Monday November 3rd, at 10:00 A.M., on the grounds of the Old Greene County Courthouse, in downtown Eutaw, Alabama.
    The Council also heard a report from Travis Boyd of the Servpro Corporation about alterations and repairs to the gym portion of the Robert H. Young Community Center, the former Carver School. The report includes removing toxic substances, such as lead paint and asbestos from the facility. The Servpro representatives gave their report to the council members to review. In the public meeting, the company representatives never spoke to the specifics of their financial proposal for the rehabilitation of the building.
    Richard Harbin of Harbin and Stough CPA firm, made a preliminary report on their audit report for Fiscal Year 2024-25, which ended September 30, 2025. Harbin said, “ Mayor Johnson has done a good job of recording the financial records of the city. She is leaving the city in good financial shape. She has helped the city to get several grants including a large one of over $3.6 million from ADEM, for water and sewer improvements for the cities of Eutaw and Boligee that jointly share in the system,” said Harbin. He said it would take some additional time to complete the audit due to accounting for the State of Alabama Retirement System which covers city employees, audit testing of accounts and payments and writing an opinion.
    In other business, the Eutaw City Council:
    • Approved a Resolution to create a bank account to hold funds from currency seized from lawbreakers.
    • Approved City Attorney Zane Willingham, writing a letter to Mayor Johnson concerning her disposition of city property without council approval.
    • Approved City Attorney Zane Willingham to send Trevaris Truman a certified letter for the return of $4,975 in funds for a clean-up contract he never started.
    • Approver registration, travel and per diem for Councilwoman-elect, Carrie Logan, to attend an orientation training for newly elected officials in Dothan, Alabama on November 12 and 13.
    • Received a report from City Clerk Sha’kelvia Spencer, on using Mills Tax Service for providing bookkeeping and payroll services for the city.
    • Approved donation of $250 to Greene County Children’s Policy Council for Halloween Festival.
    • Approved getting a Public Official Bond of $100,000 for Mayor-elect Corey Cockrell and other city officials.
    • Approved renewal of Notary Bond for City Clerk and Water clerk; and purchase of two overnight deposit from Merchants and Farmer’s Bank for deposit of city and water funds.
    • Approved reimbursement of Police Officer Tyler Johnson for $45.06 for motor oil for patrol car.
    • Removed item from the agenda to designate the 4th Saturday in August, to honor John and Carol Zippert, for work on the Black Belt Folk Roots Festival for fifty years.
    • Approved the appointment of Pamela Hamilton to the Greene County Ambulance Board.
    • Supported a Work Session to review the rental agreement for city buildings, and other facilities, including increasing the fees for clean-up costs.
    • Approved payment of Monthly bills.

  • School Board engages in Whole Board Training; holds meeting with interim superintendent

    The Greene County Board of Education met in regular session, Monday, October 20, 2025 which was also the first meeting engaging the Interim Superintendent Mr. Darryl Aikerson. The board hired Aikerson, September 24, 2025 on a contractual basis. All board members were present. The board also held its annual Whole Board Training, which is a state requirement for all board members. The Alabama Association of School Boards (AASB) conducted the training on the process of searching and selecting a school system superintendent. All board members attended, except Ms. Veronica Richardson.
    As his report to the board, Superintendent Aikerson scheduled Curriculum Coordinator, Mrs. Barbara Martin and Maintenance Supervisor, Mrs. Sharon Hardwick to present updates on their administrative areas.
    Mrs. Martin’s presentation focused on three components: Curriculum and Instruction; At-Risk Multi-Tiered System of Support; Testing and Accountability. Her report included the following: ensuring explicit and systematic instruction daily; benchmark assessment provided to students; ensuring all aspects of the Literacy Act and Numeracy Act are implemented; digital literacy is a major part of the instructional process; problem solving teams are utilized; after-school and summer learning opportunities are provided.
    Mrs. Hardwick’s Maintenance Report focused on current projects at each school facility. Outsourced projects at Eutaw Primary include duct cleaning; leak in front driveway and repair to suppression system. Robert Brown projects include awaiting new part for the elevator; installation of shades; fire alarm inspection. Greene County High: flooring issue near gym; track & field in progress; fire hydrants back on line. At Peter J. Kirksey, there is a leak underground. Greene County Water Department is assisting. Repair and/or replace HVAÇ units in Central Office.
    The board approved the following personnel items recommended by the superintendent.
    Employment: Canesha Ray Williams – Long-term substitute, Greene County High School; Adrienne Davis – Substitute Bus Aide.
    Additional Service Contracts 2025 – 2026 for the following employees at Greene County High School: (Separate Contract): Akeem Tyree – Assistant Basketball Coach; Devin Woods – Head Baseball Coach.
    Catastrophic sick leave for Carl Oliver, Lead Maintenance.
    Greene County School District After-School Tutorial Program 2025-2026:
    Eutaw Primary School: Carla Durrett-Reading Coach; Pamela Pasteur-Kindergarten; Elona Washington-1st Grade; Angela Hill-2nd Grade; Keisha Williams-3rd Grade; LaShaun Henley-3rd Grade; Carolyn Daniels-Special Services; Mary Hobson-Paraprofessional.
    Robert Brown Middle School: Vanessa Bryant-4th Grade; Demetris Lyles-5th Grade; Naomi Cyrus-6th Grade; Sylvia Williams-7th & 8th Grade; Raven Bryant-Special Services; Dorothea Childs-Special Services Paraprofessional; Pinkie Travis-Paraprofessional; Felecia Smith-Math Coach.
    Bus Drivers & Aide: Stanley Lucious; Natasha Lewis; Gerald Holloway; George Pippen; Johnnie Pelt; James Gaines; Jerdin Gray; Marsha Powell – Aide.
    The board approved the following administrative items recommended by the superintendent.
    * Capital Plan – Five Year Plan for the Greene County School System.
    * Agreement between Greene County Board of Education and Lucy Reyes for Special Education translator services for the 2025 – 2026 school year at a rate of $30.00 per hour, with a minimum of 2 hours per session.
    * Bid from Pruett Oil Company to provide petroleum products for the 2025 – 2026 school year (Only Bidder).
    * Quote from ClearWinds for Chromebook Repair Service in the amount of $32,400 (yearly renewal).
    * Payment of all bills, claims, and payroll.
    * Out-of-state travel for students and chaperones to attend The Bodies Human Exhibit in Gatlinburg, TN on December 3, 2025.
    Renewal of two Certificates of Deposit (CDs) at Merchants & Farmers Bank for the Greene County Career Center, updating the interest rate from 0.95% to 4.17% (13 Month rate) First CD – Maturity Date October 31, 2025 – $2,141.23; Second CD – Maturity Date – November 11, 2025 – $1,962.74.
    CSFO, Mrs. Marquita Lennon informed the board there would not be a financial snapshot at this meeting, since the system is in process of closing for the porous fiscal.year. October and November financial reports will be presented at the November board meeting.

  • Newswire : The lie about immigrants and America’s debt to them  

    By Jason Roberts, NNPA

    There is a lie moving through America. It creeps through congressional halls and across television screens, whispering that undocumented immigrants live freely off the sweat of the American taxpayer. It is a lie told by those who know better and repeated by those who are too ignorant—or too hateful—to care. And while the lie spreads, the truth is being brutalized on the streets.
    According to data from the Cato Institute, Immigration and Customs Enforcement has intensified its war on peaceful people. As of this past summer, ICE was arresting 1,100 percent more noncriminal immigrants than it did in 2017. By June 2025, its agents were seizing nearly 3,800 men, women, and children each week, most with no criminal record at all. They are landscapers, caregivers, construction workers, restaurant staff—the quiet hands that build this nation’s comfort. Yet ICE agents, masked and faceless, now stalk them at bus stops, schools, and home improvement stores. These are not arrests made in the name of safety—they are acts of terror disguised as law.

    The architects of this cruelty justify it with another lie: that these people are bleeding America dry, taking what they have not earned. But every ledger, every study, every dollar collected proves the opposite.

    Undocumented immigrants, forbidden from accessing almost every public benefit, pour billions into the U.S. economy. In 2022 alone, they paid $96.7 billion in taxes—nearly $9,000 each—into the same systems that exclude them. They paid $25.7 billion into Social Security, even though the law bars them from ever receiving a penny of it. Their effective state and local tax rate, 8.9 percent, exceeds that paid by the top 1 percent of U.S. earners. And still, politicians like J.D. Vance and Donald Trump tell America that these workers are stealing from it.
    They insist that Democrats shut down the government to hand health care to “illegal immigrants.” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries called that accusation what it is: a lie. “Nowhere have Democrats suggested that we’re interested in changing federal law,” Jeffries said. “The question for the president is whether he’s interested in protecting the health care of the American people.”
    NBC News confirmed that the GOP’s narrative was false. So did NPR, which reported plainly: “People living in the U.S. who are undocumented do not qualify for Medicaid. They do not qualify for tax credits on the ACA health care exchanges.” But facts no longer seem to matter. Lies feed fear, and fear feeds votes. While the powerful argue over fiction, the reality on the ground has become unbearable.
    Cato’s research shows that fewer than 6 percent of immigrants detained by ICE had violent convictions. In Los Angeles, more than 70 percent of those taken in early June had no criminal record at all. One senior White House adviser was quoted as asking ICE agents, “Why aren’t you at Home Depot? Why aren’t you at 7-Eleven?”—as if immigrant workers were quarry to be hunted.
    This is what America has become: a nation that criminalizes the hands that feed it. While undocumented families harvest crops, clean hospital rooms, and care for the elderly, their wages are taxed to fund public schools, emergency services, and the very agencies that terrorize them. They pay, but they cannot claim. They build, but they cannot belong. Then came the 2025 tax and budget law—Trump’s latest cruelty written into policy. It stripped 1.4 million lawfully present immigrants, including refugees and asylees, of their health coverage. It punished not only the undocumented but also those who had done everything right. America, it seems, has decided that suffering is the price of entry.

    What the numbers reveal is not an invasion—it is a sacrifice. Undocumented immigrants have become the unacknowledged benefactors of a country that feeds on their labor while denying their humanity. They are propping up Social Security, sustaining state budgets, and fueling industries that would collapse without them. And yet they are chased, detained, and deported under the pretense of justice. The real theft in America is not committed by the undocumented. It is committed by those who steal their dignity, their freedom, and the truth. This is not a debate about borders. It is a reckoning with the lies we tell to justify cruelty. The undocumented are not taking from America—they are keeping it alive.
    And one day, when the history of this era is written, the numbers will still speak. They will tell of millions who worked, paid, and gave everything they could, while a government lied about their worth. They will tell how America, built by the hands of the unfree, once again turned its back on the very people who held it upright. The lie about immigrants is as old as America itself. But the truth endures: they are not our burden—they are our debt.

     

     

  • Newswire : The Shutdown Standoff

    By April Ryan, NNPA White House Correspondent

     

    “We are not going to back down,” demanded House Minority Leader Congressman Hakeem Jeffries regarding healthcare for Americans. The Affordable Care Act is one of the key issues that created a stalemate between Democrats and Republicans, which resulted in the government shutdown. The New York Congressman says he is open to meeting with the president, the vice president, and others in the Republican Party to end the government shutdown that began on October 1st. However, he is adamant about not caving on the healthcare issue.
    On the Hill today, House Speaker Mike Johnson calls on Democrats to reopen the government so that negotiations can continue. Republicans need five Democratic senators to vote for the House-passed continuing resolution, which makes drastic cuts to health care. Jefferies vows Democrats will not support a “partisan spending bill that guts healthcare.” Adding to the Republican pressure on Democrats, President Donald Trump said over the weekend, furthering a verbal sparring match, “Democrats are causing the loss of a lot of jobs with a shutdown.”
    However, Jeffries says those in charge are to blame, explaining, “The extremists have complete control over the government. What are we missing here?” Republicans are in charge of the White House, the House, the Senate, and the Supreme Court. Jefferies made these comments on The Tea With April:

    “They [Republicans] would rather shut the government down than provide healthcare. ”The shutdown could last at least two weeks, creating layoffs and firings. Republicans are refusing to extend the tax credits for the Affordable Care Act for working-class Americans. Jeffries also contradicts the GOP narrative, “a Republican lie that we are trying to provide healthcare to undocumented workers.”

    Democrats emphasize that more than 24 million Americans rely on the Affordable Care Act tax credits to afford and access healthcare in this nation. In a related note, the government shutdown is also to blame for the delayed meeting between Jeffries and the Democratic New York Mayoral front-runner, Zohran Mamdani. Jeffries has not endorsed a New York mayoral candidate yet.

  • Newswire : Louisiana case could redefine Voting Rights Act protections

    Protestor for fair re-districting maps in Louisiana

    By Lawrence Hurley, HBCU News

    The way Louisiana’s Republican leaders put it, the pervasive racial discrimination in elections that led to the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act is all in the past.
    That is why they are now urging the Supreme Court, in a case (Louisiana vs Callais) being argued on Wednesday, October 15, 2025, to bar states from using any consideration of race when drawing legislative districts, gutting a key plank of the law that was designed to ensure Black voters would have a chance of electing their preferred candidates.
    Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill told NBC News that the Voting Rights Act was designed to address blatantly discriminatory policies and practices that prevented Black people and other minorities from voting decades ago.
    “I think the question now is, have we gotten to a point where those obstacles really don’t exist anymore?” she said. “I don’t think they exist in Louisiana,” she added.
    At issue is a congressional district map that Louisiana grudgingly redrew last year after being sued under the Voting Rights Act to ensure that there were two majority-Black districts. The original map only had one in a state where a third of the population is Black, according to the U.S. census.
    The state’s new legal argument, which may appeal to a conservative-majority Supreme Court, is that drawing a map to ensure majority-Black districts violates the Constitution’s 14th and 15th Amendments, which were both enacted after the Civil War to ensure former slaves had equal rights under the law, including the right to vote.
    Conservatives say those amendments bar any consideration of race at any time, and the Supreme Court has previously embraced this “colorblind” interpretation of the Constitution.
    Civil rights activists say that approach makes a mockery of both the post-Civil War amendments and the Voting Rights Act, not to mention their experience on the ground in Louisiana.
    Press Robinson, who is one of the plaintiffs who challenged Louisiana’s original congressional map, said he had to sue in 1974 just so he could take his place as an elected official on the East Baton Rouge Parish School Board. “Has Louisiana really changed? I don’t see it,” he told reporters on a recent call.
    The issue reaches the court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, just two years after it surprisingly rejected a similar bid to weaken the Voting Rights Act in The Alabama redistricting case, which created two districts that Blacks could elect a Congress-person.
    The court, however, has struck blows against the law in other rulings in 2013 and 2021.
    In the 2023 case, the court rejected a Republican-drawn congressional map in Alabama on the grounds that it discriminated against Black voters, leading to a new map being drawn that included two majority-Black districts.
    The vote was 5-4, with two conservatives, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, joining the court’s three liberals in the majority. Four other conservatives dissented.
    In Wednesday’s oral argument, Kavanaugh will be a focus of attention, in part because of what he said in his separate concurring opinion in the Alabama case.
    Although Kavanaugh voted with the majority, he expressed some sympathy for the argument that even if race could at one point be considered as a factor in ensuring compliance with the Voting Rights Act, it no longer can be.
    But, he added, “Alabama did not raise that temporal argument in this Court, and I therefore would not consider it at this time.”
    Now, piggybacking on Kavanaugh’s opinion, Louisiana’s lawyers eagerly embrace the argument Alabama did not make.
    Among other things, Louisiana points to the court’s 2023 ruling that ended the consideration of race in college admissions, which was issued just three weeks after the Alabama voting rights ruling.
    Chris Kieser, a lawyer at the right-leaning Pacific Legal Foundation, which supports Louisiana in the case, said in an interview that the upshot of a ruling in the state’s favor is that there could be no obligation to ever intentionally draw majority-Black districts.
    “Districts should not be drawn based on the expected race of the — whoever is going to be the member of Congress representing it,” he said.
    That could lead to a decline in the number of legislators at the national and state level who are Black or Latino.
    In that scenario, minority voters would still be able to bring separate racial gerrymandering claims under the Constitution if there is obvious racial discrimination, Kieser argued, although such cases are difficult to win.
    Depending on what the court does, the provision of the Voting Rights Act in question, known as Section 2, could survive in limited form.
    A ruling that leads to a reduction in majority-Black and other minority districts would have a partisan impact that could favor Republicans, as Black voters historically favor Democrats. If the court rules quickly, there is even a chance that new maps could be drawn ahead of the hotly contested 2026 midterm elections.
    The case has a convoluted history, arising from litigation over the earlier map drawn by the state Legislature after the 2020 census that included one Black-majority district out of the state’s six districts.
    The state drew the current map in order to comply with that ruling, but was then sued by a group of self-identified “non-African American” voters who argued that in seeking to comply with the Voting Rights Act, the state had violated the Constitution.
    The Supreme Court originally heard the current case earlier this year on a narrower set of legal issues but, in an unusual move, asked in June for the parties to reargue it. Over the summer, the court then raised the stakes by asking the lawyers to focus on the constitutional issue.
    As a result of that complicated background, the various briefs filed in the case — including one submitted by the Trump administration in support of Louisiana — make a number of different legal arguments.
    That makes it difficult to know ahead of Wednesday’s oral argument what the justices will focus on, said Sophia Lin Lakin, a lawyer at the American Civil Liberties Union who is part of the legal team defending the latest Louisiana map.
    “It is so strange. Normally, we would always understand the question we are trying to answer,” she said. Lin Lakin does not think the case should be used as the vehicle for a “full-on assault” on the Voting Rights Act. But, she conceded, “there is some risk the way that’s being presented that the court may be interested in that bigger question.”

  • Newswire : Israel releases 2,000 Palestinian prisoners under Ceasefire

    Palestinians wait for release of prisoners

    By  Sam Metz and Jalal Bwaitel, HBCU News

     

     Cheers erupted among Palestinians on Monday as Israel released nearly 2,000 prisoners under a Gaza ceasefire agreement that saw them exchanged for Israeli hostages freed by Hamas.
    Large crowds greeted the freed prisoners in Beitunia in the Israeli-occupied West Bank and in Khan Younis in Gaza, flashing V-for-victory signs as they descended from International Committee of the Red Cross buses. In Beitunia, they were given traditional keffiyeh scarves as a show of nationalist pride. Some were lifted onto people’s shoulders. Others sank into chairs, exhausted.
    “It was an indescribable journey of suffering — hunger, unfair treatment, oppression, torture and curses — more than anything you could imagine,” said Kamal Abu Shanab, a 51-year-old from the West Bank town of Tulkarem who was released after more than 18 years in prison.
    His face was gaunt. He said he lost 139 pounds (59 kilograms) in prison. “We don’t recognize him. He’s not the person we knew. Our uncle doesn’t look like our uncle,” said his niece, Farah Abu Shanab.
    A military court in 2007 convicted Abu Shanab of “military trainings, voluntary manslaughter and membership in an unrecognized organization,” according to Israel’s list of exchanged prisoners. He was arrested that year during an Israeli raid targeting members of the armed wing of Fatah, the political party that runs the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank.
    Those freed include around 1,700 of the several thousand Palestinians that Israeli troops seized from Gaza during the two-year war and have held without charge.
    Also among those released were 250 Palestinians sentenced to prison terms, most of them convicted for deadly attacks on Israelis dating back decades, as well as others convicted on lesser charges, according to Israel’s Justice Ministry. Of those, Israel exiled 154, sending them to neighboring Egypt, where officials said they will be sent to third countries.
    The rest were returning to homes in east Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza.
    A profound moment
    The releases have powerful resonance on both sides.
    For Israelis, they’re deeply painful, since some of those released were convicted over attacks that killed civilians and soldiers. For Palestinians, the issue of prisoners is politically charged. Nearly everyone has a friend or family member who has been jailed by Israel, particularly young men.
    While Israel views the prisoners as terrorists, many Palestinians consider them as freedom fighters resisting a decades-long Israeli military occupation. Reports from the U.N., rights groups and detainees detailing conditions while held — including isolation, beatings, insufficient food and illness — have made prisoners prominent symbols of their people’s political struggle.
    Israel says it adheres to its prison standards under law and investigates any reports of violations.
    In Khan Younis, thousands of people cheered and celebratory gunfire rang in the air. The freed Palestinians filed out wearing gray jumpsuits and entered the hospital for medical examinations.
    Israeli forces detained thousands of Palestinians during the war in raids on shelters and hospitals and at checkpoints stopping families as they fled their homes amid military operations.
    Families often had no idea their relatives had been detained, and it often took months to determine if they were in Israeli custody, if confirmation came at all. Most were held under laws passed in Israel at the start of the war that allowed Palestinians to be detained for months as “unlawful combatants” without judicial review or access to lawyers.
    Monday’s release still leaves about 1,300 Palestinians from Gaza in Israeli custody, according to a count of detainees in September by the Israeli human rights group HaMoked.

  • Commission approves CD investments with Merchants & Farmers Bank

    County Commission and School Board to determine status of ad valorem tax for schools

    The Greene County Commission met in regular session, Tuesday, October 14, 2025 with all Commissioners present. The October meeting was scheduled for the second Tuesday, since the second Monday was National Indigenous Peoples Day, a holiday observed by Greene County.
    At the Commission’s work session, held Wednesday, October 8, Ms. Marquita Lennon, CSFO of the Greene County Board of Education, presented a request for renewal of an ad valorem tax for the school system. Ms. Lennon indicated that the milage tax would expire in 2026 and the procedure for renewal required action from the county. This was an agenda item for the October 14 meeting, at which time Attorney Mark Parnell stated that according to his research, the milage tax was not scheduled to expire in 2026 because it was attached to a bond. Commission Chairperson, Garria Spencer, recommended that the Attorneys for the county and the school board communicate and bring clarity to the issue by the next commission meeting.
    The Commission approved a recommendation by Ms. Altheria Wilder, CFO for Greene County Commission, that CD investments, currently at Pinnacle Bank in Birmingham and scheduled to expire, be transferred to Merchants & Farmers Bank for better interest rates. She noted that Pinnacle offered 3.5 interest rate; Merchant &b Farmers offered seven month CD investment at 4.5 and 13 month CD investment at 4.25. The total CD investments approximately $625,000.
    In other business the Commission acted on the following items.
    * Approved hiring grant writer, Marilyn Culliver. Attorney Parnell will prepare contract.
    * Approved painting the Activity Center.
    * Advised staff to follow-up on replacing doors and glass at Activity Center.
    Approved the School Resource Officers contract.
    Approved the Supplement Agreement with Sheriff Benison, regarding the sheriff’s payment to the county for additional employees in his department.
    Approved the SSUT Resolution – Alabama Simplified Users Tax.
    The Commission approved various board appointments and re-appointments.
    Commissioner Corey Cockrell recommended the following persons from District 3:
    Ms. Shirley Edwards re-appointed to the Hospital Board; Ms. Kimberly Tyree appointed to the Greenthumb Board; Ms. DeCharo Rice appointed to the PARA Board; Ms. Vivian Carpenter appointed to the DHR Board.
    At Commissioner Tennyson Smith’s request, the Greenthumb board position for District 2 was tabled, as well as Commissioner Roshanda Summerville’s DHR board position for District 5.
    At the request of Commissioner Smith, Ms. Geraldine Walton was appointed to the Greene County Mental Health Board.
    The financial snapshot for the period ending September 30, 2025: General fund claims paid totaled $861,905.62; Payroll Transfer total $299,112.48; Fiduciary totaled $38,079.45. Electronic Claims paid August 2025 totaled $94,482.87. Citizen Trust Bank unrestricted funds totaled $1,098,587.31; restricted funds totaled $4,485,946.84. Merchant & Farmers Bank unrestricted funds totaled $2,015,221.86; restricted funds totaled $2,799,038.82. CD investments totaled $1,901.457.80.
    In the Public Comment session of the meeting, Mr. Michael Williams, former Greene County Commissioner, gave an emotional reaction to the current State Audit of the Greene County Sheriff’s operations. Williams emphasized that the nearly $5 million the State Examiners of Public Accounts reported has no documentation and must be refunded by Sheriff Benison could have been used to support local services such as the hospital, school system, fire departments, emergency services and others. He asked Greene County residents to sign a petition which will be sent to the Alabama Attorney General’s office for legal action.
    Commission Chair Spencer and Attorney Parnell emphasized that the recent State Audit Report involves only Sheriff Benison’s operations; the audit has nothing to do with the County Commission’s operations.