Tag: D-Calif.

  • Newswire : Cory Booker’s record-breaking speech ignites a Democratic base ‘desperate’ for a fighter

    Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., speaks on the Senate floor on Tuesday.NBC News

    By Sahil Kapur, Frank Thorp V, Julie Tsirkin, Kate Santaliz and Syedah Asghar
    NBC News

    WASHINGTON — Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., wanted to do something extraordinary. He knew Democratic voters were desperate for it.
    So he took to the Senate floor with little fanfare and went on to deliver a marathon speech — excoriating the Trump administration for lawlessness and undermining American values and in the process breaking the record for longest Senate speech ever, yielding last Tuesday after 25 hours and 5 minutes.
    It was a cathartic moment for a vast swath of demoralized voters across the country, who tuned in amid hunger for some action by the opposition party beyond the traditions of business as usual.And for a Democratic Party that has been lost in the wilderness since its bruising defeat to Donald Trump last fall, it offered a rare moment of hope to pursue what may be its only chance of slowing Trump down: inspiring a mass popular uprising against him.
    “There’s a lot of people out there asking Democrats to do more and to take risks and do things differently,” an exhausted Booker told reporters after he walked off the floor. “This seemed like the right thing to do. And from what my staff is telling me, a lot of people watched. And so we’ll see what it is. I just think a lot of us have to do a lot more, including myself.”
    Throughout Tuesday afternoon, Booker was trending across social media, including on TikTok, BlueSky and even Elon Musk’s X. 
    The speech got over 350 million “likes” on Booker’s TikTok livestream of his remarks, according to his office, including more than 300,000 people viewing them across his platform at once. It included over 200 stories from New Jerseyans and Americans. And it drew over 28,000 voicemails of encouragement on Booker’s office phone line, along with public accolades from Democratic luminaries like former Vice President Kamala Harris and Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., the former House speaker.
    “Rank-and-file Dems are desperate for leadership and fighters,” said Ezra Levin, a co-founder of the progressive organization Indivisible, which has accused Democrats of being too passive against Trump.
    Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., said Booker taught Democrats a lesson. “He made the Senate relevant, and he captured the moment where people were focused on the why we have to push back and stand up against Trump, as opposed to the tactical day-to-day slog,” he said. “It was very inspirational .”Yet despite the reaction, Booker’s speech won’t end Trump’s attempts to dismantle the federal government or halt his agenda of tax cuts and mass deportations from barreling through the Republican-controlled Congress. The only specific Senate business it disrupted were votes on a resolution involving Trump’s tariffs and his nominee to be the U.S. ambassador to NATO. 
    After Booker finished, the GOP moved toward a vote on that nominee, Matthew Whitaker, prompting some outside liberals to say Democrats should treat it like an abnormal moment and object.
    Democratic strategist Mike Nellis said that Booker’s move recognizes the political currency of the modern era and that Democrats can take a page from his playbook.
    “Cynics are going to call Booker’s speech a stunt. Maybe—but stunts aren’t necessarily a bad thing. The name of the game is attention,” he wrote on X. “Trump and Musk are very good at it. Democrats have struggled to take these kinds of risks to our own peril—but Cory is paving the way forward.”
    Adam Jentleson, a former senior Senate Democratic aide, said Booker marshaled the chamber’s arcane rules to great effect, posting on X that “in today’s fractured media environment, Booker single handedly drove the narrative.”
    He added that Democrats have more tools at their disposal to build on that, if they unify: “As a thought experiment, imagine what a coordinated, caucus-wide talking filibuster against, say, a GOP funding bill that cuts popular social safety net programs would look like — as opposed to just voting it down at a 60-vote threshold?”
    Booker’s preparation included 1,164 pages of material — and some unusual physical techniques to brace his body, which couldn’t sit or go to the bathroom for the entire session. A spokesperson said Booker didn’t wear a catheter or a diaper.
    And Booker managed to remain on message for the duration of his remarks, albeit with help from Democratic colleagues who joined to ask him questions. While senators before him had gone off topic during long floor remarks — like Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who read the book “Green Eggs and Ham” by Dr. Seuss during a 21-hour speech protesting Obamacare in 2013 — Booker stayed focused on highlighting what he perceived to be the negative impacts of the Trump administration’s policies.
    “I fasted for days into it. I stopped drinking water a long time ago. I think that had good and bad benefits. I definitely started cramping up from lack of water,” he said. “So there’s just a lot of tactics I was using to try to make sure that I could stand for that long.”
    “I really spent time dehydrating myself beforehand so I did not have to go to the bathroom,” he said.
    Inside the packed chamber, Booker got a standing ovation when he crossed Strom Thurmond’s record of 24 hours and 18 minutes. It was a deeply symbolic moment for Booker, who is African American, to end a record held for nearly 70 years by a man who was a symbol of segregation politics and was fighting at the time to kill the Civil Rights Act in 1957.
    “To be candid, Strom Thurmond’s record always kind of just really irked me — that he would be the longest speech, that the longest speech on our great Senate floor was someone who was trying to stop people like me from being in the Senate,” Booker told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow on Tuesday night. “So to surpass that was something I didn’t know if we could do, but it was something that was really, once we got closer, became more and more important to me.”
    NAACP President Derrick Johnson thanked Booker “for demonstrating true courage in the face of hatred.”
    “Despite Trump’s attempts to silence the voices, contributions, and history of Black people, a Black man just made history tonight in protest of Trump himself,” he said in a statement.
    Yet Booker was the first to insist his speech can’t be the end. “My constituents — the letters, the calls — the demands were definitely an ignition point for me,” he said. “But we have got to continue to ignite this movement.”

  • Newswire: Rep. Hakeem Jeffries announces bid to replace Nancy Pelosi as Democratic leader

    Congressman Hakeem Jeffries

    By Scott Wong and Sahil Kapur, NBC News

    WASHINGTON — New York Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, the fourth-ranking House Democrat, said Friday that he will run to replace House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as the party’s leader after Republicans took back control of the chamber in last week’s midterm elections.
    His announcement in a letter to colleagues came a day after Pelosi said in a powerful floor speech that she is stepping down after a two-decade reign as the top leader of House Democrats.

    If Jeffries is successful, it would represent a historic passing of the torch: Pelosi made history as the first female speaker of the House, while Jeffries, the current Democratic Caucus chairman, would become the first Black leader of a congressional caucus and highest-ranking Black lawmaker on Capitol Hill. If Democrats were to retake control of the House — a real possibility with Republicans having such a narrow majority — Jeffries would be in line to be the first Black speaker in the nation’s history.
    The ascension of the 52-year-old Jeffries to minority leader would also represent generational change. Pelosi and her top two deputies — Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., and Majority Whip Jim Clyburn, D-S.C. — are all in their 80s and are receiving from within the party for “new blood” in leadership; Hoyer will not seek another leadership post while Clyburn plans to stay on and work with the next generation.
    Reps. Katherine Clark, D-Mass., and Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., are seeking to round out the new leadership team, announcing Friday that they will run for the No. 2 and No. 3 spots in leadership. Clark, 59, announced a bid for Democratic Whip, while Aguilar, 43, is running for Democratic Caucus Chair.
    Pelosi endorsed all three to succeed her leadership team in a statement Friday, saying they are “ready and willing to assume this awesome responsibility.” Clyburn has also endorsed the three, while Hoyer backed Jeffries for leader on Thursday.
    “In the 118th Congress, House Democrats will be led by a trio that reflects our beautiful diversity of our nation,” Pelosi said. “Chair Jeffries, Assistant Speaker Clark and Vice Chair Aguilar know that, in our Caucus, diversity is our strength and unity is our power.”
    Clyburn, a towering figure in the caucus and close ally of President Joe Biden, called his protege Jeffries “absolutely fantastic” and signaled support for a full slate of younger set of leaders taking the reins of the Democratic leadership apparatus: Jeffries, Clark, and Aguilar

  • Newswire: Democrats unveil articles of impeachment against Trump

    By Lisa Mascaro and Mary Clarke Jalonick, Associated Press

    From left House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Chairwoman of the House Financial Services Committee Maxine Waters, D-Calif., Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., Chairwoman of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., House Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal and Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Adam Schiff, D-Calif., unveil articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Dec. 10, 2019.(AP Photo/Susan Walsh)


    WASHINGTON (AP) — House Democrats announced two articles of impeachment Tuesday against President Donald Trump — abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — pushing toward historic votes over charges he corrupted the U.S. election process and endangered national security.
    Speaker Nancy Pelosi, flanked by the chairmen of the impeachment inquiry committees, stood at the Capitol in what she called a “solemn act.” Voting is expected in a matter of days in the Judiciary Committee and by Christmas in the full House.
    “He endangers our democracy, he endangers our national security,” said Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., the Judiciary chairman announcing the charges before a portrait of George Washington. “Our next election is at risk… That is why we must act now.”
    The charges unveiled Tuesday stem from Trump’s pressure on Ukraine to announce investigations of his political rivals as he withheld aid to the country.
    Trump tweeted ahead of the announcement that impeaching a president with a record like his would be “sheer Political Madness!”
    The outcome, though, appears increasingly set as the House prepares for voting, as it has only three times in history against a U.S. president.
    n drafting the articles of impeachment, Pelosi is facing a legal and political challenge of balancing the views of her majority while hitting the Constitution’s bar of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”
    Some liberal lawmakers wanted more expansive charges encompassing the findings from former special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election. Centrist Democrats preferred to keep the impeachment articles more focused on Trump’s actions toward Ukraine. House Democrats have announced two articles of impeachment charging President Donald Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
    Trump, meanwhile, insisted he did “NOTHING” wrong and that impeaching a president with a record like his would be “sheer Political Madness!”
    U.S. Supreme Court Chief Judge John Roberts would preside over any impeachment trial, which would be held every day except Sunday until senators vote to convict or acquit President Trump of the articles.
    McConnell said the Senate would hear the case House officials present before deciding whether to call witnesses, the Examiner reports.
    “Or, it could decide that they’ve heard enough and they believe they know what would happen and move to vote on the two articles of impeachment,” the majority leader said.
    Fifty-one Senate votes would be required to acquit Trump — and that would most likely happen, McConnell told reporters.
    A two-thirds majority vote of the 100-member Senate is necessary for conviction and for removing Trump from office. Republicans hold a 53-47 majority.
    “I said I would be totally surprised if there were 67 senators to remove the president,” McConnell said, “and that remains my view.”