Category: Politics

  • Newswire: Civil Rights foot soldiers, Birmingham youth launch voting rights push

    Newswire: Civil Rights foot soldiers, Birmingham youth launch voting rights push

    By Staff, Alabama Political Reporter

    Civil Rights Movement foot soldiers will join Birmingham-area high school students Saturday in an intergenerational effort to defend voting rights and encourage civic participation.

    The effort will take place Saturday, June 27, beginning at 9 a.m., with phone banking at Foot Soldiers HQ, 1707 Fourth Avenue North, in Birmingham’s historic Fourth Avenue Business District. Participants will call residents to discuss the importance of voting and build support for renewed voting rights advocacy. Organizers are encouraging volunteers to bring a tablet or laptop.

    At the same time, about 30 Birmingham-area high school members of Phi Kappa Sigma High School Fraternity will gather at the Collegeville Community Center, 3029 29th Avenue West, for a community canvassing event. Students from Ramsay, Pleasant Grove, Minor, McAdory, Bessemer City, Clay-Chalkville, Hueytown and Parker high schools are expected to take part.

    The students will knock on doors and speak with residents about civic engagement, connecting a new generation of young Black leaders with veterans of the movement that helped change the nation.

    Organizers said the event is a response to ongoing efforts to restrict voting access and to the lasting effects of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision, which weakened key protections of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

    The decision struck at the heart of the federal preclearance system, which had long required certain states and localities with histories of racial discrimination in voting to receive federal approval before changing election laws. For many voting rights advocates, the ruling marked a turning point in the modern fight over ballot access.

    Saturday’s effort is designed to show that the struggle for voting rights is an unfinished obligation.

    “There’s something powerful about seeing a foot soldier in their 70s and a 17-year-old student fighting for the same thing,” said Bryan Jenkins, fraternity adviser. “This isn’t history, this is now. Our foot soldiers fought too hard for the right to vote, and we can’t sit back and watch it being dismantled. We’re passing the torch to the next generation, and they’re ready to carry it.”

    The event is powered by The People’s Project, a collaborative community initiative led by neighborhood association presidents, activists, faith leaders and civil rights organizations. The group’s mission is to spur civic engagement and bring residents into the public life of their communities.

    For Birmingham, the symbolism is hard to miss.

    The city’s young people helped force America to confront the brutality of segregation during the Civil Rights Movement. Now, another generation of students is being asked to understand that the right to vote, once won, must still be protected.

    Saturday’s events will place those generations side by side: movement veterans who carried the fight before them and students being called to carry it forward.

    The Alabama Political Reporter is a daily political news site devoted to Alabama politics. We provide accurate, reliable coverage of policy, elections and government.

    Read the original article here


    Featured image: Protestors raising hands and a megaphone (iStock/Alabama Political Reporter)

  • A sense of history: Why this Black Belt county has Alabama’s highest voter turnout

    A sense of history: Why this Black Belt county has Alabama’s highest voter turnout

    By Drew Taylor, Alabama Reflector

    EUTAW — In the town square of Eutaw, the modern world hems in a relic of an older one that no longer exists.

    The Eutaw Hotel is long gone. Even among older locals, the V.J. Elmore’s Five & Dime is nothing but a faint memory. Places like Mills Pharmacy or Main Street Diner get the foot traffic these days. But inside the square, the old Greene County Courthouse still stands, along with a towering oak tree just yards away.

    The tree was much shorter when Earlean Isaac, then 15 years old, marched with others to the courthouse for voting rights in 1965. It was where Isaac, who would go on to become the first Black female probate judge in the county, was beaten by a police officer.

    “He hit me with his Billy club,” Isaac said.

    By 1969, with a newly ordered election mandated by the Supreme Court to recognize the National Democratic Party of Alabama, voters would elect four Black candidates– Harry Means, Franchie Burton, Vassie Knott and Levi Morrow Sr.—to the Greene County Commission and put two new Black members, Robert Hines and James Posey, on the Greene County School Board. These six men put Greene County on the map as the first county across the country since Reconstruction to put a majority-Black government in office.

    A year later, outside the very courthouse where Isaac was beaten, Thomas Gilmore, a minister who had returned to Greene County from Los Angeles a few years prior, was sworn in as the first Black sheriff in Greene County, going on to get the nickname of “The Sheriff Without a Gun.”

    Today, across the street from the old courthouse sits the new one, named after William McKinley Branch, the first Black probate judge in Greene County. It’s a history that plays a crucial part in the area’s voter turnout, often among the highest across Alabama in any given year.

    Leading the vote in Alabama

    During the primary election in May, Greene County had a 51% voter turnout, compared with the 23.11% turnout statewide. Countywide, there are 6,332 registered voters.

    “Usually, our voter turnout depends on who’s on the ballot that will really drive the votes out,” Isaac said.

    There were several big local races in Greene County this spring, including races for a district judge and sheriff. But Greene County consistently outpaces the rest of the state for turnout. In the 2022 primary, 44.5% of the county’s eligible voters cast ballots. In 2020, Greene County’s turnout for the presidential election was 68.3%, compared to 62.8% statewide. In 2024, while the state as a whole posted its lowest voter turnout for a presidential election in over 30 years with 58.5%, nearly 61.7% of Greene County’s registered voters turned out to the polls.  

    This comes despite Greene County being Alabama’s smallest county by population. Just 7,730 people lived there in 2020, according to the U.S. Census. Recent estimates have that number closer to 7,000 as of last July. Greene County also ranks as among the oldest, with a median age close to 44, and one of the poorest, with a median household income of about $29,200, compared to $63,999 statewide.

    Richard Fording, a political science professor at the University of Alabama, said that because of these obstacles, trying to explain this surge of voters in both Greene County, as well as the Black Belt as a whole, is complicated.

    “These are counties where the demographic disadvantages are pretty extreme,” Fording said. “It’s more interesting for that region.”

    However, for people from Greene County, one thing it has never lacked is political involvement. Rep. Curtis Travis, D-Tuscaloosa, who remembers meeting both Gilmore and Branch as a boy at his father’s garage in Eutaw, credits his home county with putting him in the Alabama Legislature in the first place.

    “Greene County was the one that got me over,” said Travis, who beat Ralph Anthony Howard by 500 votes in Greene County to win the Democratic primary in 2022.

    For Travis, one aspect of Greene County’s high voter turnout, as well as much of the Black Belt’s, is a recognition of the past and how Black people were able to make change with the vote.

    “That empowerment is something that is shared with pride,” Travis said. “They keep it alive, and they know where they come from.”

    Community centers are one way the community tries to keep that tradition alive, often hosting candidate forums with locals. However, Travis said these forums are anything but easy for anyone looking for votes.

    “There was one candidate who came out to speak to the seniors at the Boligee Community Center and it was like he was on trial,” Travis said. “They like to get their questions out there.”

    Hattie Samuel, mayor of Bolligee, said the town’s community center, located in the former Greene County Training School, has always been a good place for people to talk about politics and engage with the political system.

    “What we do is when a candidate qualifies to run, we like to study that person,” Samuel said. “A lot of people at the center can’t get around for the campaign, so having these candidates come here has been great.”

    Severe Strode, a 93-year-old woman who lives in Boligee, is a regular at the Boligee Community Center and one of those in Greene County who tried to keep that empowerment alive, getting out to vote in the last primary.

    “This election, I feel more people felt a need for change in Greene County,” Strode said. “I also vote because it is one of my civil rights.”

     In “There Goes My Everything: White Southerners in the Age of Civil Rights, 1945-1975,” author Jason Sokol wrote that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was a crucial change in momentum for Black Alabamians in Greene County.

    “As Blacks made up more than 75% of the population, they quickly surpassed whites on the voting rolls,” Sokol wrote. “Suddenly a political minority, few Greene whites knew exactly what had hit them.”

    The shift played out in dramatic fashion in Eutaw’s town square, where in 1966 Black and white Alabamians gathered to watch as the vote counts were rolling in for the sheriff’s race. Bill Lee, a former tackle for the Green Bay Packers, had already been sheriff for 10 years, but the office had been held by his father and brothers going back as early as the 1930s. 

    Challenging Lee was Gilmore, had come back home to Greene County just a few years before from Los Angeles. In the time since he had come back, Gilmore led many protests in Eutaw, often coming face to face with Lee.

    Gilmore ultimately came up short, getting only 1,949 votes to Lee’s 2,246.

    Despite court challenges to the results, Lee would hold onto office. But in an interview with Marshall Frady of Newsweek, the former sheriff seemed to predict what was about to come.

    “But you know — I don’t understand a bit of it,” Lee said of the civil rights movement, as recounted in Frady’s “Southerners: A Journalist’s Odyssey.” “This thing’s so massive. I mean, you just can’t expect 1,500 hundred people to be able to keep beating off 2,700. It just stands to reason they bound to win something eventually.”

    Today, Black Alabamians make up almost 80% of the population.

    Protecting that legacy may also help mobilize voters this year. Fording, whose area of focus is voter turnout, said that with the Supreme Court giving the Republican-led Alabama Legislature permission to redraw its congressional map, all but wiping out a predominantly Black Congressional district, there has been a sense of urgency for Black voters, especially those in marginalized areas like the Black Belt, to make their voices heard and vote.

    “That has sent shockwaves into that community,” Fording said.

    Like Fording, Isaac believes the redrawn Congressional lines in Alabama will continue to bring out people to the ballot box.

    “Our voice is being diminished,” she said. “The little voice we do have is being taken away from us.”

    Spiver Gordon lives less than a mile from the old Greene County Courthouse, yet only yards from the place he keeps history alive.

    Next to his home on Greensboro Street, Gordon keeps up the Magnolia House, part of the Alabama Civil Rights Freedom Farm Museum that holds hundreds of artifacts from the civil rights era, from photos of Martin Luther King, Jr. to an article by the Montgomery Advertiser announcing Isaac’s swearing in as probate judge back in 1989.

    As Gordon walks into each room, another table of framed photos appear every time he flicks on the lights. Even the bathroom has different rows of photos he’s been trying to restore.

    “I have their stories here,” said Gordon.

    Gordon worked for the Southern Christian Leadership Conference before becoming the first Black member of the Eutaw City Council in 1984. He has had his ups and downs in politics, but said that Greene County has always had a vibrant political history.

    “It’s been a continued process,” Gordon said.

    Isaac, who served as probate judge until 2016, remembers how people took election years pretty seriously, especially precinct leaders in places like West Greene or Boligee.

    “In Boligee, they would celebrate how they toppled Forkland in a particular race by getting more votes,” she said.

    Fording said that in places with older populations in the Black Belt, where some still remember a time before the Voting Rights Act, casting a ballot is taken as a kind of civic responsibility.

    “As a region, the strong sense of group identity is in the fact that the voting rights struggle is still very salient in those communities,” he said. “Any surge happening now is how current events are triggering those memories.”

    Despite the challenges facing Greene County, Isaac still loves the area and knows that better things are in store for it.

    “I travel a lot, but after a couple of days, I always want to come back to Greene County,” she said. “This is home.”

    As Gordon looks out onto Greensboro Street, a stack of bricks sits next to the Magnolia House. At 86 years old, Gordon has plans to add onto the building, adding more rooms, more pictures, and more memories. For him, and for Greene County, the work isn’t done yet.


    Read the original article on the Alabama Reflector’s website here

    Featured Image: Spiver Gordon stands inside Magnolia House, a civil rights museum in Eutaw, Alabama, U.S., on Friday, June 5th, 2026 (Andi Rice /Alabama Reflector)

  • Washington D.C.  — U.S. Rep. Terri Sewell (AL-07) announced that House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries has selected her to serve as Co-Convener of House Democrats’ Cost of Living Healthcare Working Group alongside Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14).

    Washington D.C.  — U.S. Rep. Terri Sewell (AL-07) announced that House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries has selected her to serve as Co-Convener of House Democrats’ Cost of Living Healthcare Working Group alongside Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14).

    By Christopher Kosteva, Office of Representative Terri Sewell (AL-07)

    Washington D.C.  — Today, U.S. Rep. Terri Sewell (AL-07) announced that House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries has selected her to serve as Co-Convener of House Democrats’ Cost of Living Healthcare Working Group alongside Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14).

     

    The Healthcare Working Group is one of five Cost of Living Working Groups established by House Democratic leadership to further develop Democrats’ affirmative agenda focused on lowering costs and making life more affordable for the American people. The other working groups will focus on Housing, Gas and Utilities, Groceries and Goods, and Caregiving. Each working group will be led by an ideologically diverse team of co-conveners working closely with Democratic Caucus and committee leaders.

     

    “We are grateful that Leader Jeffries has selected us to serve as Co-Conveners of the Cost of Living Healthcare Working Group,” said the Representatives. “Healthcare costs remain one of the biggest challenges facing working families, and ensuring every American has access to quality, affordable healthcare has never been more important.”

     

    “As Republicans and the Trump Administration pursue devastating cuts to healthcare programs that millions rely on, Democrats must put forward a bold vision that lowers costs, expands access, and strengthens care for future generations,” continued the Representatives. “We look forward to working with our colleagues across the Caucus to develop forward-looking policy solutions that deliver meaningful results for the American people.”

     

    Rep. Sewell brings extensive healthcare policy experience to the role. She serves on the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, which has jurisdiction over Medicare and other critical healthcare programs, and currently serves as Chair of the New Democrat Coalition Health Care Working Group. Throughout her time in Congress, Rep. Sewell has been a leading advocate for expanding access to affordable, quality healthcare, strengthening Medicare and Medicaid, protecting the Affordable Care Act, lowering prescription drug costs, and reducing health disparities in underserved communities.

     

    The Healthcare Working Group will engage Members from across the Democratic Caucus and work collaboratively with Ways and Means Committee Ranking Member Richard Neal (MA-01) and Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Frank Pallone (NJ-06) to develop policy recommendations aimed at lowering costs and expanding access to healthcare. The effort reflects House Democrats’ commitment to advancing an agenda that addresses the everyday challenges facing working people and delivers tangible results for communities across the country.

     

    ###


    Featured image: Left: U.S. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez at a “Fight Oligarchy” rally at Mullett Arena in Tempe, Arizona. (Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0/Wikimedia Commons) Right: Terri Sewell during a breast cancer awareness month Twitter post (CC BY-SA 4.0/Wikimedia Commons)

    The original article was sent in a press release email to The Democrat.

    Contact: Christopher Kosteva, (202) 878-0049
    Christopher.Kosteva@mail.house.gov

  • Terri Sewell secures $5 Million, $250,000 goes to the City of Eutaw

    Terri Sewell secures $5 Million, $250,000 goes to the City of Eutaw

    PRESS RELEASE

    CONTACT:
    Christopher Kosteva, (202) 878-0049
    Christopher.Kosteva@mail.house.gov


    Rep. Sewell Secures $5 Million for Community Projects in Alabama’s 7th Congressional District in FY27 Transportation-HUD Funding Bill

    Washington D.C. — Today, U.S. Rep. Terri Sewell (AL-07) announced that she secured $5,086,138 in federal funding for ten community projects across Alabama’s 7th Congressional District in the Fiscal Year 2027 Transportation, Housing and Urban Development (THUD) Appropriations Act. The legislation was approved by the House Appropriations Committee on June 3. It now moves to the full House for consideration.

    The funding would support critical investments in public safety, affordable housing, infrastructure, economic development, and community revitalization in Jefferson County, Tuscaloosa, and across Alabama’s Black Belt.

    “These federal investments will help strengthen our communities, improve quality of life, and create new opportunities for the people I represent,” said Rep. Sewell. “From replacing aging emergency equipment and improving local infrastructure to revitalizing downtown business districts and expanding community spaces for seniors and families, these projects respond directly to the needs identified by local leaders across Alabama’s 7th Congressional District. I will continue fighting to bring federal resources home and ensure that our communities receive the investments they deserve.”

    Jefferson County

    • $1,000,000 for the City of Fultondale’s Fire Engine Replacement Project to replace aging emergency response equipment and strengthen public safety capabilities.

    • $776,000 for the City of Center Point Senior Center Renovation Project to modernize and improve the facility, allowing it to serve more seniors.

    • $460,138 for the City of Irondale Gateway Project to improve community infrastructure and enhance a key entrance corridor into the city.

    • $250,000 for the City of Birmingham Fire and Rescue Facility Renovation Project to improve facilities used to train first responders and support public safety operations.

    • $250,000 for the Princeton Senior Tower Housing Project in Birmingham toward the development of a 100-unit affordable senior living facility in the historic Arlington Westend neighborhood.

    Choctaw County

    • $850,000 for the Town of Lisman Community Center Renovation Project to renovate and improve a community facility that serves residents throughout the area, including the addition of temporary housing, a dedicated workforce development training space, an education and safety briefing space, and ADA-compliant restrooms.

    Sumter County

    • $500,000 for the University of West Alabama’s Downtown Livingston Revitalization Initiative to enhance public safety, modernize infrastructure, improve sidewalks and pedestrian access, upgrade lighting, and expand economic opportunities in historic downtown Livingston.

    Wilcox County

    • $500,000 for the City of Camden Infrastructure Improvement Project to support storm sewer replacement and utility improvements along Whiskey Run Road that will strengthen local infrastructure and improve public services.

    Greene County

    • $250,000 for the City of Eutaw Community Center Revitalization Project to improve the Robert Young Community Center with a modern exterior design, new metal roofing system, upgraded interior flooring, and full renovation for community and business use. 

    Tuscaloosa County

    • $250,000 for the Tuscaloosa Housing Authority Project to support affordable housing through the development of additional homeownership units for qualified first-time home buyers as a part of the Springer Estate Project.

    “While there is still work to do before these investments become law, I am pleased that the House Appropriations Committee recognized the importance of these projects to Alabama’s 7th Congressional District,” Sewell added. “I will continue working with my colleagues in the House and Senate to secure final passage of these critical investments for our communities.”

    ###

  • Run-off yields lower turnout than primary

    Run-off yields lower turnout than primary

    This past Tuesday, June 16th, Greene County held a run-off election for the Greene County Commission and one Democratic Senate seat. Only 1,578 of the 6,332 registered voters participated in the run-off.

    In the race for County Commission, District 1, incumbent Garria Spencer received 230 votes (55.69%) to Larry Smith with 183 votes (44.31%). For County Commission, District 3, incumbent Latasha Johnson received 269 (48.12 %) and Jacqueline Stewart 290 (55.69 %). Spencer and Stewart will serve a four-year term alongside Smith, Tennyson, and Hodges after the November election. Jacqueline Stewart was endorsed by the Alabama New South Alliance (ANSA) for this race. Johnson did not attend the ANSA endorsement meeting.

    For state races, Everett Wess, a democratic candidate for United States Senator, had 688 votes (53.33%) to Dakarai Larriett’s 602 (46.67%). Wess will be running against republican nominee Barry Moore for the Senate seat. Wes Allen, republican candidate for Lieutenant Governor, won in Greene County with 67 (52.76 %) votes to John Wahl’s 60 (47.24%). Allen is the current president of the Republican New South Coalition.


    Election Summary Results

  • Newswire: Advocates Say SCOTUS Voting Rights Decision Has Already Started to Reshape Black Political Power

    Newswire: Advocates Say SCOTUS Voting Rights Decision Has Already Started to Reshape Black Political Power

    By Edward Henderson, California Black Media

    U.S. Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-CA-37), a member of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) whose district spans parts of Los Angeles County, joined fellow CBC member U.S. Rep. Troy Carter (D-LA-2) for a May 21 briefing with Black media outlets in California. 

    The lawmakers highlighted what they describe as a mounting threat to Black political representation resulting from an April 29 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that weakened key protections under the federal Voting Rights Act.  

    Kamlager-Dove and Carter warned that the decision, which narrowed the role of race in redistricting, is already reshaping congressional districts across the South and undermining Black voters’ ability to elect candidates of their choice. 

    “While I support building coalitions, we have to make sure that as a Black community we are not yielding our power,” she added.

    Calling the fight “not unique to the South,” Carter urged Black communities nationwide to recognize the broader implications of the legal and political battles unfolding in Southern legislatures and courtrooms. 

     

    The Supreme Court ruling centers on Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the portion of the law that prohibits voting systems or district maps that dilute the voting strength of racial minorities. For decades, Section 2 allowed civil rights groups to challenge district maps that weakened Black political representation even when lawmakers did not openly state discriminatory intent.

    Now, advocates fear that standard has fundamentally changed. 

    The implications could stretch far beyond congressional elections, Brown said.  

     

    Section 2 protections have historically applied not only to U.S. House districts, but also to state legislatures, school boards, county commissions, judgeships, and local governing bodies. Voting rights advocates warn that weakening those protections could reshape political representation throughout the South, particularly in states with large Black populations. 

    “This is not just a Southern issue,” said Amir Badat, manager of Black Voters on the Rise and voting special counsel at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. 

    Badat described the current moment as part of a much longer historical pattern. 

    “This is the same move,” Badat said. 

     

    Advocates also emphasized that the consequences of weakened voting protections extend into everyday life. 

    Local elected offices such as school boards, city councils, county commissions, and judgeships often determine funding priorities, public safety policy, education standards, and infrastructure investments. 

    “These are not abstract numbers,” Badat said. “These have real political consequences and policy consequences on people’s day-to-day lives.”


    Featured image: Black voter (Shutterstock / NNPA)

  • Newswire: More Than 770,000 Children Are No Longer Receiving SNAP Benefits After Trump Changes Federal Food Program

    Newswire: More Than 770,000 Children Are No Longer Receiving SNAP Benefits After Trump Changes Federal Food Program

    BY NICOLE SANTA CRUZ, PROPUBLICA

    As a House committee debated President Donald Trump’s signature domestic policy bill last year, Republican backers repeatedly emphasized that its changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as food stamps, wouldn’t affect vulnerable people.

    SNAP reforms would “restore integrity” to the program and ensure it works for the “most vulnerable among us, including children,” said Rep. Glenn “GT” Thompson, a Pennsylvania Republican and chair of the House Agriculture Committee.

    Passing the bill would be a “historic accomplishment” that will ensure “those in need can continue to receive the assistance they need,” said Rep. John Rose, a Republican from Tennessee.

    And Rep. Dusty Johnson, a South Dakota Republican, said the bill would focus resources on the “neediest” Americans. “If you are a pregnant woman, your benefits are unaffected. If you have young children at home, your benefits are unaffected by this bill. If you are disabled, your benefits are unaffected by this bill.”

    But nearly a year after the measure was signed into law, the number of children receiving food assistance has plummeted by at least 776,000, according to a ProPublica analysis. At least 12 states break down program participation by age, and of the 1,670,011 people who are no longer receiving benefits in those states, 776,134, or 46%, were children.

    Another analysis reached the same conclusion: Just last month, the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found there were 700,000 fewer children receiving food assistance.

    Arizona has seen the nation’s largest percentage decline in SNAP participants; 205,223 children are no longer receiving the benefit since July 2025, a 55% drop. Louisiana had the second largest percent decline among children, 22%.

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture, which oversees SNAP, hasn’t detailed the impact on children aided by the program, but initial figures show that compared to February 2025, 4.3 million fewer people received SNAP nationwide in February 2026, leaving 37.8 million participants.

    Although children weren’t the intended targets of the legislation’s changes, they’re increasingly “collateral damage,” said Katie Bergh, a senior policy analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

    If states are trying to comply with the law’s changes to SNAP, they’re likely not focusing on making the program accessible, Bergh said. Other experts said that people may be pushed off the program because of increased paperwork requirements to remain eligible.

    States are required to impose work requirements for most adult recipients, while preparing for two major cost shifts. In October, states will begin covering 75% of the program’s administrative costs. States have been paying 50% of those costs.

    In addition, states will have to pay a larger share of SNAP benefits starting in October 2027, based on their error rate. Error rates reflect overpayments or underpayments of SNAP benefits. While sometimes characterized as fraud, such errors are usually the fault of the state agency or the SNAP recipient, according to USDA, which describes them as “largely unintentional.”

    If a state agency is facing staffing shortages and struggling to comply with new regulations, it will be harder for low-income families to access the benefits, Bergh said. “Families are falling through the cracks.”

    In Massachusetts, for example, the share of SNAP applicants who called an assistance line and couldn’t reach a worker rose from 61% in November to nearly 81% in March, according to the Department of Transitional Assistance, which administers SNAP in the state. The state agency did not respond to a request for comment.

    A USDA spokesperson did not address ProPublica’s questions about the number of children who have lost access to SNAP. “There is no shortage of resources for the most vulnerable among us, including children,” the spokesperson said.

    The three members of the House Agriculture Committee who defended last year’s bill before its passage — Rose, Thompson and Johnson — did not respond to ProPublica’s questions about their statements now that many children no longer receive SNAP benefits.

    Rep. Jim McGovern, a Massachusetts Democrat, asked Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins about her recent comments that it was “good news” that millions of people no longer receive SNAP. If more than 700,000 children have been dropped in the 12 states that report those figures, “that number’s going to be into the millions” when other states are included, he said.

    Rollins responded, “The 700,000 number of children is not correct,” contending that most people who were kicked off SNAP were “fraudulent.”

    “That is not a nonpartisan group that gave you that number,” she said. (ProPublica independently verified the figures reported by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.)

    McGovern said he has talked to people who have lost food assistance. “These are people who actually need and rely on this food assistance to provide basic nutrition for their families,” he said.

    Pressure to lower error rates “creates a temptation for the states to bump off working families,” said Parke Wilde, a food economist at Tufts University. Working families may have more volatile incomes, making it harder for state agencies to assess benefits accurately.

    “When they say we want to preserve SNAP for those with the greatest need, they’re sort of acknowledging that they want the scale of the SNAP program to be smaller,” he said.

    Mariana Chilton, an expert in child hunger at University of Massachusetts, Amherst, said a smaller program won’t save money in the long run. Research shows that children who receive SNAP benefits are healthier, have better academic outcomes, use hospitals less often and have better mental health as teenagers.

    She called the situation a “public health crisis” in the making. “When children are not healthy, this affects children today and it affects them throughout their lifetimes,” she said, likening hunger during early childhood to a brain injury.

    As Arizona’s SNAP participation drops, nonprofits are feeling the effects. St. Mary’s Food Bank, the largest in the state, has seen a 15% increase in need this year, which translates into 300,000 more visits from people in search of food, said Milt Liu, the chief executive officer.

    “It’s important for everyone to realize that policies have implications for people on the edge, and we’re seeing that in our line every day,” he said.

    On a recent morning, Ana Alvarez waited in a line of vehicles at a St. Mary’s food bank in Phoenix. Alvarez, a single mother of five who works at a restaurant, started coming to St. Mary’s after she lost her SNAP benefits in September.

    She reapplied for SNAP with the Arizona Department of Economic Security in December, but the application is still pending. The department did not respond to questions about its backlog.

    She clips coupons and has cut out trips to the zoo and restaurants with her children. The slow season at the restaurant where she works is about to hit. And as summer temperatures rise, Alvarez wonders how she will afford her electric bill, her rent and her car payment.

    At least once a week she contacts the agency about her application. The last time she called, a worker told her what others have in the past: She will have to keep waiting.


    Featured Image: Mary’s Food Bank in Phoenix (Rob Schumacher/THE REPUBLIC/IMAGN)

  • Newswire: Congressional Black Caucus presses companies in the US to oppose Republican redistricting push

    Newswire: Congressional Black Caucus presses companies in the US to oppose Republican redistricting push

    by Matt Brown, AP News

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Congressional Black Caucus on Tuesday called on major corporations across the U.S., including those that previously expressed support for voting rights and racial justice, to oppose redistricting efforts by Republican-led states that seek to eliminate majority-Black U.S. House districts.

    In a letter sent to more than 250 companies, members of the Black Caucus urge them to condemn the redistricting efforts, which the lawmakers describe as “coordinated efforts to silence Black voices at the ballot box.” Some of the companies had cosigned their own message to Congress five years ago urging lawmakers to pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, a Democratic proposal to restore and update the Voting Rights Act.

    That 2021 coalition, Business for Voting Rights, was backed by many of the country’s most valuable and influential companies, including Apple, Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Tesla, Salesforce, Target, PayPal, Intel and Starbucks.

    Tuesday’s letter is the latest effort by the Congressional Black Caucus and its allies to gather support for preventing more Republican-led states from redrawing their legislative maps in ways that would dilute Black political representation. Several states have moved to eliminate congressional districts represented by Black Democratic lawmakers after a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last month that severely weakened a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.

    “Corporations that have profited from Black consumers, relied on Black workers, and amassed wealth in part from Black communities cannot look away while Black political power is dismantled in plain sight,” Rep. Yvette Clarke, chair of the Black Caucus, said in an interview.

    A woman wearing an orange patterned jacket holds a decorative fan and a document labeled 'U.S. House of Representatives' outside the Capitol building, with a crowd in the background.
    Rep. Yvette Clarke, D-N.Y., chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, prepares for a news conference at the Capitol (AP Photo by J. Scott Applewhite)

    Clarke described the letter as “putting corporate America on notice,” but she said the caucus was not seeking an adversarial relationship with corporations. Among those receiving Tuesday’s letter were companies based overseas that have a significant presence in the U.S.

    The caucus last week called for Black athletes to boycott public universities in states that are gerrymandering their congressional maps to eliminate districts held by Black lawmakers. The 59-member Congressional Black Caucus consists entirely of Democrats, including more than a third from Southern states.

    Some lawmakers have said mass protests and federal legislation might be necessary to undo the efforts underway in Republican-led states. Any new federal voting rights law would almost certainly require Democrats to secure majorities in both chambers of Congress and win the presidency.

    It is unclear how companies will respond to the demands. One firm, the outdoor clothing company Patagonia, said that it had received the caucus’ letter and endorsed its message. 

    “A healthy business depends on a healthy democracy,” said Corley Kenna, an executive at Patagonia. “Patagonia stands with those who work to increase representation and defend free and fair elections.”

    The Associated Press reached out for comment to dozens of companies that were sent a letter by the caucus, but did not receive a response from most firms. Microsoft declined to comment.

    “Many companies that previously issued statements after the murder of George Floyd, pledged billions toward racial equity initiatives, and spoke forcefully in defense of democracy following January 6 now face a defining test of whether those commitments were rooted in principle or convenience,” the caucus’ letter states.

    It also represents the latest instance of the caucus expressing frustrations with corporate America. A 2024 Black Caucus report noted that lawmakers were “troubled that some corporations that made pledges in 2020 have taken several steps in the opposite direction,” such as rolling back or failing to follow through on pledges to diversify their workforces.

    “We understand who the occupant in the White House is and the reality of Republicans being in charge,” Democratic Rep. Steven Horsford of Nevada said of the caucus’ message. “But what corporate America also understands is that there will be a shift at some point.”

    The letter calls on companies to publicly condemn the redistricting plans, meet with Black Caucus members to discuss corporate America’s role in protecting voting rights and disclose their political donations to Republican politicians in states that are redistricting their congressional maps.

    President Donald Trump last year kicked off the unusual mid-decade round of congressional redistricting when he pushed Texas lawmakers to redraw their maps in a way that would add Republican seats. Democratic-led California responded, but it has been mostly Republican states redrawing their lines since as the party tries to maintain its majority in the U.S. House during this year’s midterm elections.

    The effort was supercharged by the Supreme Court decision, which allowed even more Republican states to redraw congressional maps that previously had protected minority communities.

     

    Horsford, who chaired the Black Caucus during President Joe Biden’s Democratic administration, said the caucus is demanding that companies “stand on the side of democracy, fairness and equal representation.” 

    “This is about power, who holds it and what it’s used for,” he said. “And when you’re diluting Black economic and political power, we need to know where these companies stand in this moment, and what side of history they’re on.”


    Featured Image: Rep. Terri Sewell, D-Ala., center, is surrounded by members of the Congressional Black Caucus as they speak to reporters in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling to strike down a majority Black congressional district in Louisiana, at the Capitol in Washington, Wednesday, April 29, 2026. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
  • Newswire: Former NBA Star Derrick Coleman Rejects Alabama Honors Over Redistricting

    Newswire: Former NBA Star Derrick Coleman Rejects Alabama Honors Over Redistricting

    Subscribe to continue reading

    Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.

  • Newswire: Supreme Court’s Alabama redistricting ruling marks brazen reversal of its previous stance

    Newswire: Supreme Court’s Alabama redistricting ruling marks brazen reversal of its previous stance

    by Jim Saksa, Democracy Docket

    The U.S. Supreme Court’s Republican-appointed majority erased all doubts about the sweeping nature of its recent voting rights jurisprudence Tuesday night with a shadow docket ruling that effectively reverses the Court’s own decision in the same matter just three years ago.

    The unsigned emergency order in Allen v. Milligan goes beyond the court’s recent Louisiana v. Callais decision, which merely nullified the Voting Rights Act’s (VRA) prohibition on unintentional racial discrimination, to also make it all but impossible for judges to strike down a map as intentionally discriminatory. 

    It does so by essentially flipping its own 2023 ruling in the same case. 

    In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor excoriated that decision to go down the “path” that “disregards both democratic values and the rule of law, leading to “a chaotic election, held under a never-before-used congressional map that intentionally discriminates against Black Alabamians, that Alabama adopted in unashamed defiance of a prior court order directly affirmed by this Court, and that will require officials to change the voter registrations of hundreds of thousands of voters in just days at best, a task that Alabama previously represented would take months.”

    Sotomayor noted that Tuesday’s decision was the third time Alabama’s congressional map had found its way before the high bench, lamenting that “[e]ach turn reveals just how unconscionable the Court’s action is today.”

    It was the Supreme Court’s surprising decision to uphold Section 2 of the VRA in Milligan just three years ago that gave civil rights groups and voting advocates some glimmer of hope that it might truly preserve the law again in Callais.

    Immediately after Callais came out in late April, Alabama asked the Supreme Court to vacate the lower court’s injunction blocking it from using the congressional map it enacted in 2023 — the map the Supreme Court ultimately rejected in Milligan as VRA violation.

    The court granted that wish and remanded the case down to the district court, which then entered another injunction, saying the map was “tainted by intentional race-based discrimination.” 

    But on Tuesday, the Supreme Court vacated again, saying the lower court failed to “heed the presumption of legislative good faith… because it interpreted the State’s legal disagreement with the court’s earlier remedial order as proof of discriminatory animus.”

    The Supreme Court explained that the plaintiffs failed to show that their alternative map performed “‘just as well’ with respect to all of the State’s constitutionally permissible redistricting criteria,” as required by Callais. 

    “Yet, the District Court found a violation even though the plaintiffs’ alternative map would not perform just as well as to the State’s constitutionally permissible criteria of keeping together the Gulf Coast community of interest and avoiding the pairing of incumbents,” the majority held.

    But, as the Guardian’s Sam Levine noted on social media Tuesday night, the court came to the exact opposite conclusion in the very same dispute just three years ago.

    “Alabama argues that the Gulf Coast region in the southwest of the State is such a community of interest, and that plaintiffs’ maps erred by separating it into two different districts,” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the majority in 2023. “We do not find the State’s argument persuasive.”

    That inconsistency belies Justice Samuel Alito’s claim in Callais that the Court was not striking down Section 2 of the VRA, but instead merely “properly constru[ing]” it, as UCLA Law professor Rick Hasen noted. 

    “[T]here’s now practically an unrebuttable presumption that a legislature is acting in good faith and therefore is not acting in a racially discriminatory way so long as the state can assert some pretextual nonracial reason for enacting its plan,” Hasen wrote after the decision’s publication. “So in these cases, plaintiffs will need to meet an impossible standard to prove effect, just as in a post-Callais Section 2 case, a standard which simply ignores the fact that when (white) Republicans discriminate against Democrats in the south, they are discriminating against Black voters.”

    “More and more, this Court shows itself to be little more than a partisan tool engaged in results-oriented jurisprudence, despite protestations to the contrary,” he added.

    Sotomayor’s dissent, which the court’s other two Democratic appointees joined, highlighted the majority’s hypocrisy and the chaos it unleashed.

    “Now the Court is squarely faced with a record of the turmoil it has caused and the harm it has wrought,” Sotomayor wrote. “Yet just as Alabama doubled down on racial discrimination, the Court today doubles down on chaos.”

    In December, the Supreme Court set aside a district court’s finding that Texas intentionally used race to redraw its congressional maps last year, emphasizing that, consistent with its shadow docket order in Purcell v. Gonzalez, “that lower federal courts should ordinarily not alter the election rules on the eve of an election.”

    But now, seven months later, the majority decided to do just that, Sotomayor noted, saying it has unleashed “havoc,” and “tramples on that principle of restraint,” established in Purcell. 

    “To switch to the 2023 Redistricting Plan now, however, county elections officials will have to reassign hundreds of thousands of voters across the State to new congressional districts,” Sotomayor wrote. “Three of Alabama’s counties will be particularly hard hit because they are split across two congressional districts. These counties have about 600,000 registered voters between them (roughly 15% of the State’s total number of registered voters).”

    In the order, the majority seems to suggest that Purcell only applies to lower courts, not the Supreme Court, by emphasizing “lower” federal courts, rather than just federal courts. 

    But, as Columbia Law School professor Jamal Greene noted, Justice Kavanaugh said otherwise in 2022’s Moore v. Harper, where he agreed with denying plaintiff’s request for “an order from this Court requiring North Carolina to change its existing congressional election districts for the upcoming 2022 primary and general elections.”

    “It is too late for the federal courts to order that the district lines be changed for the 2022 primary and general elections,” Kavanaugh wrote. 

    Kavanaugh went on to cite his recent concurrence in Merrill v. Allen — the first time Alabama’s congressional map appeared before the court. In that order, issued in February 2022, the Supreme Court vacated the lower court’s injunction of the map’s use, saying it was too close to the election. 

    “In addition to being wrong on the merits, the Court’s decision inflicts two grave harms on the public,” Sotomayor wrote. “It debases the democratic process by upending Alabama’s entire election in the name of permitting Alabama to discriminate against Black Alabamians. It also corrodes the rule of law by rewarding Alabama’s gamesmanship and outright defiance of court orders.”

    Ashley Cleaves contributed to this report.


    Featured image: All Roads Lead to the South National Day of Action Participants (Melissa Bender/NurPhoto via AP)